1 Chronicles
12:19-14:17; Romans 1:1-17; Psalm 9:13-20; Proverbs 19:4-5
Today we begin Romans. When I was in seminary, I took an
entire course just on Romans. Can you believe that? A whole 16 weeks, dedicated
to just one book. And you know what I discovered? It could have been a yearlong
course! Romans is so rich and full and complex. I’m excited for us all as we
begin our journey into Romans.
Since there is so much depth in this book, I thought a few
words of background might help us gain some good footing as we begin to wade in
the waters of this book. Romans was written by Paul, as you probably know, and
most historians place its writing around the end of Paul’s 3rd
missionary journey, probably around AD 57. As we see in Romans 1:10-11, Paul has never been to Rome and has been longing to come (so clearly,
this book was written before Paul’s imprisonment in Rome, the details of which
we just finished reading in Acts). Paul has been longing to come to the church
in Rome, to impart to them “some spiritual gift to strengthen [them]” (Rom. 1:12). There are lots of theories about how the church in Rome got started but
the best one is probably that Roman Jews were converted on the day of Pentecost
and brought this new faith back to their synagogues in Rome (see Acts 2:10). So
this church has been growing steadily, but without the guidance of one of the
apostles, and therefore Paul seeks to come to them to teach and encourage them; since
he’s been tied up in other areas of ministry and hasn’t yet been able to get to
Rome, he decides to write them a lengthy letter.
Just as there are many theories about the how the church in
Rome got started, there are also many theories about the main purpose of
Romans. I could write pages and pages about this (and, in fact, did so in my
seminary class), but I’ll try to boil it down to just a few major points. I
believe, at its root, the book of Romans is actually a book about race. Does
that surprise you? It did me, when I was first coming to this conclusion. But if
you’re willing to read with an open mind, I think you’ll find there is lots of
support for this idea. As we read our way through, particularly in chapters
9-11 and 14-15, we’ll see that Paul spends lots of time in addressing issues of
race. The Jewish Christians in Rome were using the Law as a leveraging point
over the Gentile Christians; the Gentile Christians were arrogant in their
belief that God had passed over the Jews in favor of the Gentiles. Paul writes
to the Romans to teach them how to think about the law and faith – that our
faith in Jesus saves us, but not just for our own personal gain, but for the
benefit of all of humanity, as we spread God’s kingdom here on earth. As one
commentator puts it, “Paul wrote to correct the Gentiles’ indifference, even
arrogance, toward the Jewish minority at the same time that he tries to show
the Jews that they must not insist on the law as normative factor in the
church” (Moo, The New International
Commentary on the New Testament: The Epistle to the Romans, 19).
Given then, that this is predominantly a book about race and
is motivated by Paul’s desire to see the Christians in Rome, whether Jew or
Gentile, be unified, what relevance does it have for us today? A great deal,
I’d say. In the past years, we’ve seen a dramatic increase in the conflict
between races, not just in America but all over the world. Violence has
increased as we cannot seem to sort out our differences. Other differences, not
just race relations, have also driven wedges between believers, and Paul’s call
to the Romans more than 2,000 years ago is still just as poignant to us today:
“May the God of endurance and encouragement grant you to live in such harmony
with one another, in accord with Christ Jesus, that together you may with one
voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, welcome
one another as Christ has welcome you, for the glory of God” (Rom. 15:5-7).
So as we’re reading through Romans in the next couple of
weeks, I challenge you to be on the lookout to see new ways of reading Paul.
And let us know what you think by posting comments below!
PS – For those interested in a more in-depth look at some of
the theories about Romans, we are sending a second post out today, which will contain a paper that summarizes a theory
called “The New Perspective,” which has been gaining in popularity in the last
40 years. This paper dissects the pros and cons of the theory. I found this
when I was looking back through my old notes. In a nutshell, the New Perspective advocates
a different idea on Paul’s hopes for the church in Rome. Traditionally,
theologians (such as Martin Luther), have taught that Paul’s big push is to
teach the Jews in Rome that justification (salvation) is through faith, rather
than works. But according to the New Perspective, Paul was actually just
questioning the observances of circumcision, food laws and Sabbath rules.
According to the New Perspective, the thought is that Paul realized that the
Jews were using these markers as a way to distinguish themselves from the
Gentiles and claim salvation because they were God’s chosen people. They didn’t
necessarily think the Law saved them, but rather being Jewish, and Paul wants
to correct that belief, teaching that regardless of whether someone is Jew
or Gentile, the thing that saves us is Jesus. Again, if you want more info on
the New Perspective, check out the next post. One more quick note – the author
of the paper writes from the PCA denomination, which stands for Presbyterian
Church in America. That’s why you’ll see several references to that group.
- Esther McCurry
How did God speak to you in Scripture today? Click here to share your reflections on God's word or read past posts. We'd love to hear from you.
No comments:
Post a Comment